Italienischer Humanismus und Marxismus. Zum Problem Theorie und Praxis ( Fortsetzung und Schluß).Ernesto Grassi – – Zeitschrift für Philosophische. Karl Korsch, Marxismus und Philosophie (Leipzig, C. L. Hirschfield, ). © Telos Press Publishing. «Previous | Next Article» Table of Contents. Buy Marxismus und Philosophie by Karl Korsch (ISBN:) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders.
|Published (Last):||28 June 2014|
|PDF File Size:||3.90 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.99 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Does not philosophy to this day continue to search its subject, does it not since long wander with a double meaning, here haughtily claiming the royal purple robe of all sciences, there modestly taking on the job of salesman of any science? The second thing, which I would not want to leave in silence, is the somewhat — if one can put it this way — cautious relation to science from the side of comrade Korsch.
This entry has no external links. That every practical step brings something new to theory, this is not subject to doubt, because knowledge is always given only in practice; but that every new philosophei forces a review of theory — that is not true.
Similarly, Marx and Engels do not force us to consider the denial by philosophy of scientific socialism to be fictitious.
From this it follows that the abstract route, korsh route of pure scientific critique outside revolutionary struggle for this abolition, does not and cannot exist: But by denying the royal throne of philosophy, Marxism likewise excludes the necessity for it to take on the role of hawker of truth marxlsmus by another, ensuring it an independent place among different sciences.
Marxismus und Philosophie
Related Content Load related web page information. Search for related content. For the activity of this social class, the representative ideology of which is opportunism, needs an entirely other guide than dialectical materialism. In reality, this is exactly what happened: Therefore Marxism remains a scientific and practical resource to this day so far as, and as long as, the realization of it by the indicated road of development of reality has not become a fact.
Italienischer Humanismus und Marxismus. What is the position of Marxism in relation to philosophy?
But, after all, one cannot ignore that this is only a figurative expression, and in its precise parts it can escape even the author himself, which, in my opinion, happens in this case.
First of all, one cannot avoid to bring attention to the fact that comrade Korsch admits a certain — if such an expression be permitted — liberty in handling the term maxrismus Socialism and Marxism in Social and Political Philosophy categorize this paper.
The widespread opinion claiming this is a nonsensical question, like the question of the relationship of two incomparable, qualitatively different things, is the answer given by the vulgar Marxists. To put the matter before oneself so means manipulating pjilosophie words, designating the phenomenon, but not the substance, the expression of which it appears as.
True, comrade Korsch allows one to understand what he has in mind by philosophy, as the expression of the revolutionary movement or as the comprehensive theory of social revolution. Nevertheless, the interest of kogsch question raised by it does not allow one to pass over some of the positions, advanced by the author, deserving praise in every way for the thoroughness with which the themes are treated, and to a certain extent justifies the resolve in — perhaps somewhat prematurely — speaking out about them.
With such philosophy, as a science of sciences, soaring above all branches of knowledge and connecting them together,”  were finished once and for all, for those who do not want to recognize philosophke mystical ways of knowledge, by Marxism. In any event, the visible agreement of bourgeois professors and orthodox Marxists of the Second International in this question is a fact. Find it on Scholar. Monthly downloads Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
The first Marxist period coincided with the revolutionary storm of the s, and in its essence reflected the state of this society. With such a formulation of the problem, in the opinion of the author, not only does it raise the problem to its highest meaning, like the problems of state and revolution, but also allows us to understand the neglect of it by the theoreticians of the Second International: Neither Marx nor Engels ever saw philosophy as nonsense that had no place in their revolutionary practice.
Jordan – – New York: Alert me to new issues of telos.
Karl Korsch, Marxismus Und Philosophie – PhilPapers
Nevertheless, he declares, and promises further on to demonstrate, that regardless of all differences, they both coincide in one crucial point: After all, what constitutes the conception of philosophy on which Marxism in the end depends? Because both sides come to similar solutions of the question, starting from different points of departure, the author does not consider it possible to present both points of view at once, preferring to set them out separately.
Contrariwise, any different conception of philosophy, recognition marxissmus its specificity, unknown to science, means a step back to the viewpoint of the — so to speak — pre-Marxist period. And exactly against such conception of ,arxismus as a sort of super-science presenting a human absolute truth, Marxism directed its blows.
And in this sense opportunism cannot be understood as a new type of Marxism: That, if I succeeded in reporting correctly, is the content of the article knd comrade Korsch.
But this solution in no way corresponds to the actual marxiismus of affairs. Hegelian philosophy, as also all classical philosophy of German idealism, is none other than the translation of French revolution in the language of German speculation.
Once we hold for philosophy a specific character of understanding, we recognize for it a specific method of searching truth, a method, unknown to science, providing philosolhie comparative scientific knowledge, but the very absolute philosophical truth. Counter-revolutionary practice could hardly correspond with a philosophical algebra of revolution: What content it is invested with puilosophie this conception is impossible to say, precisely.
This crisis of Marxism affects the philosophle between the economic and the social spheres and the relation of economic reality to ideology. Platypus Review 48 July-August Moreover, in fact, the bourgeoisie in the days of its revolutionary youth also took other forms of philosophy, leaving the philosophy of Kant and Hegel. Comrade Korsch asserts that the classical philosophy of German idealism from Kant to Hegel is an expression of the bourgeois revolutionary movement.